This site presents a reconstruction of events based on public records and source documents. All conclusions are derived from those materials.

The Story Timeline The Players Source Documents Declarations Contradictions

The Declarations

Three waves of declarations were submitted to Vancouver Police and the Clark County Prosecutor's Office between September 2025 and January 2026. None were independent witness statements.

Across three waves spanning four months, 20+ declarations were submitted — to VPD, to the PA's office, and to the Chief of Police, the Attorney General, OSPI, and the Mayor.

Det. Alie's investigation established that none were individualized statements of personal knowledge. The first two were co-authored with attorney Alan Harvey. The next 20+ were word-for-word identical, circulated via social media and workplace mailboxes. The final four share extensive verbatim passages.

Signers interviewed by Alie consistently stated they did not write the declarations and believed they were signing a petition.

Wave 1
Sep 2, 2025
The Original Packet
2 declarations · Co-authored with Harvey
Wave 2
Sep 17 – Oct 3, 2025
The Mass Form Declarations
20+ identical copies · Signed under perjury
Wave 3
Jan 5, 2026
The Substantive Declarations
5 declarations · Shared verbatim passages

Wave 1: The Original Packet

Sep 2, 2025
Delivered by Kendall Thiemann to VPD East Precinct

Two declarations — from Angie Bunda and Camille Lowman — were included in Thiemann's original complaint packet. Both were co-authored with attorney Alan Harvey. Both are nearly word-for-word identical. Both contain the same erroneous date.

Bunda & Lowman: Same Author, Same Error

When Det. Alie asked Bunda who wrote her declaration, she identified Alan Harvey as a "friend" who helped. She said they "worked on it together." Harvey later told Alie he "only assisted the original complainants by providing them with the declaration forms" — a claim Alie found inconsistent with the evidence.

Both declarations are written in unnecessarily formalized language. Both open with "I am over the age of eighteen (18) and competent to testify to the facts set forth herein and make this declaration upon personal knowledge." Both raise the same contract interpretation issues. Both contain the same erroneous date — signed "1st day of September 2022" despite referencing events from September 2023.

Det. Alie's assessment: "The language, content, and format of the declarations was appearing to be Alan Harvey's work product and not individualized witness statements."

Sources: Bunda & Lowman declarations (Wave 1), Bunda recorded interview, Det. Alie Supplements 2 & 4

Verbatim Match

Bunda Declaration vs. Lowman Declaration

Bunda Declaration
"I became aware that Evergreen School District Chief Operations Officer (COO) Jenae Gomes, on or about September 4, 2023, signed a Supplemental Contract... I have not been able to locate any known record where the Evergreen School District Board of Directors approved or adopted or set provisions for special or extended service payments..."
Bunda Declaration, signed "September 1, 2022" [sic]
Lowman Declaration
"I became aware that Evergreen School District Chief Operations Officer (COO) Jenae Gomes, on or about September 4, 2023, signed a Supplemental Contract... I have not been able to locate any known record where the Evergreen School District Board of Directors approved or adopted or set provisions for special or extended service payments..."
Lowman Declaration, signed "September 1, 2022" [sic]

Wave 2: The Mass Form Declarations

Sep 17 – Oct 3, 2025
Delivered to the Clark County PA's Office and forwarded to VPD

Twenty or more identical four-page declarations, all signed under penalty of perjury. Distributed via the EPS Advocate Facebook page and through workplace mailboxes at the EPS bus barn. All are word-for-word the same. None were individualized witness statements. The language mirrors Harvey's published email, including the Josephine Townsend comparison.

VPD Investigative Finding
"What is clear from these documents is that they were written by the same original source. The way the documents are written is clearly intended to make it appear the Vancouver Police have initiated an investigation and allegations against Gomes."
Det. Jay Alie, Supplement 2 — Page 011

How They Were Circulated

The form declaration was posted on the EPS Advocate Facebook page (operated by Angie Bunda) with encouragement for others to sign and submit copies. Shimea Potter told Alie she saw the declaration on the page, messaged Bunda, and received a copy to sign.

At the EPS bus barn — where SEIU Local 1948 members work — the declarations appeared in workplace mailboxes. Jodi Cowell told Alie she "showed up at work one day to find this statement in her work mailbox." She signed it and gave it to a co-worker who was collecting them.

David Kerney, a police officer in another Washington county, received the document from his mother-in-law, an EPS bus driver. He is not an EPS parent — despite the declaration being written in first person claiming he is. He told Alie he "didn't know what I was talking about" when first contacted.

What the Signers Actually Knew

Det. Alie interviewed a sampling of the signers. None had independent knowledge of the allegations. None wrote the declarations. Most didn't fully understand what they signed.

"I didn't know this was for a crime... that's not fair whatsoever. I thought this was more about the way the whole strike was handled."
CS
Corey Sutcliffe
Signed declaration · Wife is EPS bus driver
"I didn't honestly realize it was like a legal thing. I thought it was something for the strike, or pay. I signed it to appease my mother."
CK
Cortney Kerney
Signed declaration · Didn't read it
"I thought they would look into her about the whole strike thing. That she didn't want to agree to the bus drivers and the paraeducators. I guess I didn't read it thoroughly, did I?"
CS
Corey Sutcliffe
On what he thought he was signing
"Not without googling it."
SP
Shimea Potter
Asked if she knew what RCW 9.94A.411 was — it's quoted in the declaration she signed
"I have no idea. I don't understand strikes, I don't get unions. I know nothing of that. I didn't know this was about some criminal claim against her."
CS
Corey Sutcliffe
Asked if Gomes should be charged with a crime
"The document wasn't something that I fully understood."
DK
David Kerney
Police officer · Not an EPS parent · Signed at mother-in-law's request
VPD Investigative Finding
"It would be more accurate to describe that the declaration contributors who were willing to talk to me believed they were signing something similar to a petition rather than a statement of facts they intended to represent as their own independent knowledge."
Det. Jay Alie, Supplement 4 — Page 037
Verbatim Match

Harvey's Published Email vs. Wave 2 Declaration Language

Harvey Email — Published Sep 11, 2025
References the Josephine Townsend case, comparing the current complaint to a situation where an attorney was convicted of forgery after years of dishonesty that went unreported by the professional community around her.
Harvey email published by Bunda on EPS Advocate, Sep 11, 2025
Wave 2 Declaration — Last Page
Contains a paragraph referencing the Josephine Townsend case in nearly identical terms, comparing the forgery conviction to the current allegations against Gomes and suggesting similar dishonesty has gone unaddressed.
All 20+ Wave 2 declarations, identical language

Wave 2 Signers

Name Date Signed Interviewed by VPD Notable Doc
Kyle Young9/21/25First in this waveView
Corrie Young9/21/25Word-for-word identical to Kyle YoungView
Malia Silverthorne9/22/25View
Rachael Campbell9/22/25View
Kathryn FertickView
Nicholas GatesScanned diagonally on copierView
Angela Gates9/21/25YesWould not identify who wrote the declarationsView
Jeff ZhaoView
Rebecca GoldmanView
Shimea PotterYesGot declaration from Bunda's FB pageView
Jodi CowellYesFound in work mailbox at bus barnView
David Kerney9/27/25YesNot an EPS parent. Police officer in another county.View
Cortney KerneyYes"Signed to appease her mother"View
Corey SutcliffeYes"Didn't know this was for a crime"View
Karyn SutcliffeNo responseEPS bus driverView
Crystal StaderNo responseView
Arlene MiroNo responseView

Wave 3: The Substantive Declarations

Jan 5, 2026
Submitted by Camille Lowman to Chief Price, OSPI, AG, ESD 112 Superintendent, Mayor of Vancouver

Five declarations submitted after Det. Alie had already closed the investigation and referred the complainants for malicious prosecution. Unlike the form declarations, these are multi-page documents with exhibits — but they share extensive verbatim passages indicating collaborative drafting rather than independent testimony.

The Four Substantive Declarations

Declarant Pages Role Notable Content Doc
Adam Aguilera32Teacher, Shahala MSLongest declaration. Filed the original complaint that triggered the Kaiser investigation. Contains Katie Rich's declaration as an exhibit.View
Danny Stevenson19Former payroll employeeDisputes Williams' characterization of his departure. Claims non-voluntary separation confirmed by ESDC.View
Tim Siess5EPS employeeShares verbatim passages with Aguilera and Stevenson declarations.View
Katie Rich5EPS employeeAlso included as an exhibit within Aguilera's compilation.View

Lowman's Second Declaration & New Allegations

Lowman submitted her own second declaration alongside the four substantive ones. In her accompanying emails, she accused Garrett Williams of providing "false or misleading information" to Det. Alie in his October 28 email — a crime she characterized as making Alie the victim.

She also alleged that payments to Williams' law firm were not "publicly approved by the ESD Board in compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act requirements" and suggested that a different law enforcement agency should investigate because "VPD Det. Jay Alie was the victim of one of these crimes."

Sources: Lowman emails (Jan 5–6, 2026), Lt. Olson Supplements 7–9 — Page 043–047

Verbatim Match

Shared Passages Across Aguilera, Stevenson, and Siess Declarations

Shared Section: Dodge v. ESD
All three substantive declarations contain identical sections analyzing the Dodge v. Evergreen School District case, using the same language, the same legal citations, and the same conclusions. These sections do not appear to be written by the individual declarants.
Aguilera (pp. 8-12), Stevenson (pp. 6-9), Siess (pp. 2-3)
Shared Section: Williams Billing / MRSC Analysis
All three also contain identical sections on MRSC overtime analysis and Garrett Williams' billing practices, using the same figures, the same framing, and the same editorial conclusions about the district's legal spending.
Aguilera (pp. 18-22), Stevenson (pp. 12-15), Siess (pp. 3-4)

Timing: Submitted After Investigation Was Closed

Det. Alie signed his final substantive supplements on December 2, 2025, formally closing the investigation and recommending the PA's office review the complainants' conduct for potential malicious prosecution. The Wave 3 declarations were submitted on January 5, 2026 — more than a month after the investigation concluded.

The declarations were not submitted to the investigating detective. They were emailed by Lowman to Chief Price and cc'd to OSPI, the Attorney General's office, the ESD 112 superintendent, the Mayor of Vancouver, and Lt. Olson. Olson documented the submissions in Supplements 7–9 with the recommendation: "Refer to the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney's Office for review and charging determination."

Sources: Lt. Olson Supplements 7–9 (Page 043–047), Det. Alie Supplement 5 signed Dec 2, 2025 (Page 039–041)